Leadership is more than a set of skills; it relies on a number of subtle personal qualities that may be hard to see, but are very powerful.
Typically, managers have a low tolerance for ambiguity and are most comfortable in more stable, well-defined situations. Leaders, however, will be comfortable in the midst of rapid change, innovation, unclear authority, and broad-reaching empowerment.[1] This is a crucial distinction. Since a leader is so involved in the future, he must function effectively in an environment of some uncertainty – personal as well as organisational. The manager’s focus, however, is primarily on the present so he functions well in a more certain environment.
Effective managers will be good at dealing with well-defined problems; for example, how to increase efficiency in a certain department. But leaders must be adept at handling problems that are nebulous or ambiguous, such as what is the future direction of that department in the midst of a changing external environment. The higher people rise in an organisation, the fewer facts they typically have to inform their decisions.
Consequently, an ability to handle – and even thrive in – ill-defined and complicated situations is a critical leadership capacity. Many good managers become confused and hesitant in ambiguous circumstances, and try to delay their decisions until they have all of the available facts. Others are prematurely decisive when they ought to be more reflective. Effective leaders do neither. They are comfortable acting in gray areas and are often able to move forward in ill-defined and complex situations to the organisation’s advantage, seeing opportunity where others are only seeing confusion. This is a crucial distinction between leaders and managers.
Management can be more formal and distant in its relationships with others, while leadership means being emotionally connected to others. Where there is leadership, people are not merely performing tasks or activities; they become part of the community and feel that they are significant. Leaders deny their own desires for recognition, recognise the contributions of others, and let others know they are valued.
Sometimes, effective managers rely too heavily on systems, policies and procedures, rigidly expecting others to operate in the same manner. Such people can succeed in an organisation until they rise to very senior positions, where their need for regimentation tends to alienate others and stifle creativity.
Management means providing answers and solving problems, whereas leadership requires the courage to admit mistakes and doubts, to take risks, to listen, to trust, to be vulnerable, and to learn from others. Emotional connections are risky but necessary for true leadership to happen.
Good leaders will have an open mind that welcomes new ideas. Moreover, they are willing to be nonconformists, to disagree and say no when it serves the larger good, and to accept nonconformity from others rather than try to squeeze everyone into the same mind-set. They will step outside the traditional boundaries and comfort zones, take risks, and make mistakes in order to learn and grow.
Good leaders will be honest with themselves and others to the point of inspiring trust. They will set high standards by doing the right things, rather than just going along with standards set by others.
Because leaders are so vulnerable, take risks, and initiate change (which typically encounters resistance), leadership causes wear and tear on the person. Therefore, leaders must be tough.
| | |
|---|
| Embrace ambiguity and change | Prefer clear roles, structure, and stability |
| Thrive in complex, unclear situations | Excel at solving well-defined problems |
| Build community and value people | May rely on systems and remain formal |
Courage and vulnerability | Admit mistakes, take risks, learn from others | Often stick to procedures and avoid risk |
| Welcome new ideas and diverse perspectives | May prefer conformity and consistency |
| Inspire trust by doing what’s right | May follow the status quo |
| Endure pressure, criticism, and resistance | May avoid conflict or change |
In short:
Leadership starts within — it requires heart, courage, and character, not just skill.
You can download the self-evaluation below to assess your personal qualities.
Download the evaluation here [1] Years ago, I attempted to begin a ministry that involved a coalition of several pastors. The attempt failed because I was not able to describe the future of the proposed ministry with sufficient clarity to the participating pastors. What was sufficiently clear to me was not to several of them and the ministry never got off the ground.